过刊检索
年份
《城市交通》杂志
2011年 第3期
融合可持续理念的交通规划方案比选方法——以亚特兰大大都市区为例
点击量:5268

文章编号:1672-5328(2011)03-0082-13

Christy Mihyeon Jeon1, Adjo A. Amekudzi2, Randall L. Guensler2 著,张 嵩3,李 浩4,黄洪佳5 译
(1.帕森斯集团,佐治亚州 诺克斯市30092, 美国;2.佐治亚理工学院土木与环境工程学院,佐治亚州 亚特兰大市30332,美国;3. 天津市渤海城市规划设计研究院,天津300451;4. 中国城市规划设计研究院,北京 100044;5.宁波城乡规划研究中心,浙江 宁波 315000)

摘要:越来越多的机构开始为交通系统的可持续发展定义,并试图将这一概念融入区域交通规划过程。然而,只有极少数的区域规划机构意识到了交通系统和土地利用变化给经济、环境和社会生活质量(这三者通常被认为是可持续交通系统的三个基本方面)带来的广泛影响。首先,论述了使用多个可持续发展指标的多准则决策方法,并应用其评估亚特兰大大都市区的三个交通和土地利用规划方案。然后,介绍了作为交通决策支持工具的可持续发展综合指数,用于减少多指标综合评价方式导致的信息过载。这一评价方法有助于决策者在确定交通规划方案时综合考虑可持续性,并能根据已确定的目标识别最可持续(或最不可持续)的规划方案。

关键词:交通规划;决策;指标;可持续发展;可持续交通

中图分类号:U491.1+2

文献标识码:A

Evaluating Plan Alternatives for Transportation System Sustainability: Atlanta Metropolitan Region

Written by Christy Mihyeon Jeon1, Adjo A. Amekudzi2, Randall L. Guensler2, Translated by ZHANG Song3, LI Hao4, HUANG Hong-jia5
(1. Parsons Corporation, Norcross, GA 30092,USA; 2. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332,USA; 3. Tianjin Bohai Urban Planning & Design Institute, Tianjin 300451, China; 4. China Academy of Urban Planning & Design, Beijing 100044, China; 5. Ningbo Urban-Rural Planning Research Center, Ningbo Zhejiang 315000, China)

Abstract:A growing number of agencies have begun to define “sustainability” for transportation systems and are attempting to incorporate the concept into the regional transportation planning process. Still, very few metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) capture the comprehensive impact of transportation system and land use changes on the economy, environment, and social quality of life, which are commonly considered the essential three dimensions of sustainable transportation systems. This paper demonstrates an application of the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach for evaluating selected transportation and land use plans in the Atlanta region using multiple sustainability parameters. A composite sustainability index is introduced as a decision support tool for transportation policymaking, where the sustainability index considers multidimensional conflicting criteria in the transportation planning process. The proposed framework should help decision-makers with incorporating sustainability considerations into transportation planning as well as identifying the most sustainable (or least unsustainable) plan for predetermined objectives.

Keywords:transportation planning; decision making; performance measure; sustainable development; sustainable transportation