过刊检索
年份
《城市交通》杂志
2019年 第2期
完整街道的完整性评估
点击量:731

文章编号: 1672-5328(2019)02-0062-13

Nancy Hui1, Shoshanna Saxe1, Matthew Roorda1, Paul Hess2, Eric J. Miller1, 3 著,康浩4 译
(1.多伦多大学土木工程系,安大略省多伦多M5S 1A4,加拿大;2.多伦多大学地理与规划系,安大略省多伦 多M5S 1A4,加拿大;3.多伦多大学交通研究中心,安大略省多伦多M5S 1A4,加拿大;4.中国城市规划设计 研究院,北京100037)

摘要: 衡量完整街道完整性的工具可以被用于制定政策、决定基础设施投资优先考虑的区域以及如 何分配单个街道的路权。回顾了评估完整街道设计最前沿的研究文献。评估完整街道必须先建立基 于现实情况的完整性评定标准,而此标准需通过建立街道分类体系将不同类型街道优先体现的功能 和预期目标相结合。标准指标体系应体现街道的完整程度,包括交通、环境及场所等要素,同时也 应足够灵活,从而能够阐述实现这些功能的各种方法。除极个别外,文献回顾的大多数指标体系都 不适合用来评估完整街道,因为这些评估体系大多仅衡量街道是否具备特定的设计要素。另外,一 条街道的完整性还可以依据其交通运行、环境和场所方面的标准来评估,也可以与所属街道分类制 定的预期目标进行比较。因此,考量一条街道涉及很多因素,如何界定完整街道的优劣及评价指标 仍然有许多工作要做。

关键词: 完整街道;环境敏感性设计;交通;场所;环境

中图分类号: U491.2+2

文献标识码:A

Measuring the Completeness of Complete Streets

Written by Nancy Hui1, Shoshanna Saxe1, Matthew Roorda1, Paul Hess2, Eric J. Miller1, 3, Translated by Kang Hao4
(1.Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto Ontario M5S 1A4, Canada; 2.Department of Geography and Planning, University of Toronto, Toronto Ontario M5S 1A4, Canada; 3.University of Toronto Transportation Research Institute (UTTRI), Toronto Ontario M5S 1A4, Canada; 4.China Academy of Urban Planning & Design, Beijing 100037, China)

Abstract: A tool for measuring the “completeness” of a complete street has applications in developing policy, prioritising areas for infrastructure investment for a network, and solving the right-of way allocation problem for individual streets. A literature review was conducted on the state-of-art in the assessment complete street designs. Complete streets assessment requires a context-sensitive approach, thus contextsensitive standards of “completeness” must first be established by combining a street classification system with sets of priorities and target performance levels for the different types of streets. Performance standards should address a street's fulfilment of the movement, environmental, and place functions, and be flexible enough to account for the many ways that these functions of a street can be fulfilled. Most frameworks reviewed are unsuitable for evaluating complete streets because, with few exceptions, they guide street design by specifying the design elements for inclusion on the street. Secondly, the performance of a street can be assessed according to transportation, environmental, and place criteria, and compared to the target performance levels specified by the street's classification. As there are many different impacts to consider on a street, additional work is required to define the priorities and performance objectives for different types of streets.

Keywords: complete streets; context-sensitive design; transportation; place; environment