文章编号： 1672-5328（2026）01-0013-11

惠英1，李伟江1，廖佳妹2，郭佳怡1
(1. 同济大学道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室，上海201804；2. 中汽研汽车检验中心〔武汉〕有限公司，湖北武 汉430056)

摘要： 在存量为主的城市发展阶段，落实非机动交通路权优先意味着对街道时空资源的再分配和路 权关系的再调整，需统筹协调多元主体之间的复杂权益关系。融合产权、工程与经济社会学等多学 科视角，界定了路权的内涵、主体与客体及其相互关系，将具体权益划分为过程权力和结果利益， 从而构建了多元主体视角下的街道路权概念体系。针对实践中存在的管理权责分散、公众诉求表达 不畅、更新动力机制不足等难点，研究归纳出单中心政府主导型、单中心政府引导型、在地机构支 持型、多部门协作型4 类路权调整模式。围绕空间、经济、文化3 个维度构建评估指标体系，通过 问卷调查评估了非机动交通视角下不同路权调整模式的效益差异。最后，从推动多元共治、探索适 宜实施路径以及完善动力机制3个方面提出对策建议。

关键词： 非机动交通；路权优先；街道更新；多元主体；效益评估

中图分类号： U491.2+2

文献标识码：A

Street Right-of-Way for Non-Motorized Traffic from a Multi-Stakeholder Perspective

Hui Ying1, LiWeijiang1, Liao Jiamei2, Guo Jiayi1
(1. The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201804, China; 2. CATARC Automotive Inspection Center [Wuhan] Co., Ltd.,Wuhan Hubei 430056, China)

Abstract： In the current stage of stock-oriented urban development, prioritizing the right-of-way for nonmotorized traffic signifies the reallocation of spatial and temporal resources on streets, as well as the re-adjustment of right- of- way relationships. This process requires a comprehensive coordination of complex rights and interests among multiple stakeholders. Integrating insights from property rights theory, engineering, and economic sociology, this paper defines the connotations, subjects, and objects of right-of-way and their interrelations. Specific rights and interests are further categorized into processual power and outcome benefits, thereby constructing a conceptual framework for street right-of-way from a multi-stakeholder perspective. To address practical challenges, such as fragmented administrative responsibilities, poor expression of public demands, and insufficient motivational mechanisms for renewal, the paper identifies four types of right-of-way adjustment models, including the single-center government-led model, the single-center government-guided model, the local institution-supported model, and the multi-department collaborative model. An evaluation index system is established across spatial, economic, and cultural dimensions and questionnaire surveys are used to assess the benefits and differentiation of these models from a nonmotorized traffic perspective. Finally, the paper proposes recommendations in three areas: advancing multistakeholder co- governance, exploring appropriate implementation pathways, and improving incentive mechanisms.

Keywords： non-motorized traffic; right-of-way priority; street renewal; multi-stakeholder; benefit evaluation